Strauss Zelnick's Perspective on Game Pricing: Focus on Overall Value

Take-Two CEO sparks value discussion in gaming, emphasizing gameplay depth and speaking about developer challenges.

Image credit: Rockstar Games, GTA 5

Take-Two CEO Strauss Zelnick's recent comments on game pricing have sparked a discussion on the value of video games. While initial reports suggested Zelnick advocated for hourly pricing, a closer look might reveal his focus on the overall value compared to other forms of entertainment, according to GamesIndustry.biz. Zelnick argues that the depth and length of gameplay make video games a good value for players, citing GTA 5's 80 hours of gameplay for $60 as an example. However, perceptions of value can vary among people, products, and brands.

Image credit: Rockstar Games, GTA 5

As Christopher Dring has noted, data shows that games with longer gameplay tend to perform well in sales. Super Mario 3D All-Stars faced criticism for its perceived lack of effort but sold nine million copies in three months due to its combined 80 hours of gameplay. Balancing the demand for longer experiences with maintaining high-quality gameplay poses a challenge for developers. The ongoing economic climate with reduced consumer confidence and financial concerns further fuels the conversation around game length and value.

During the 2007-2008 financial crisis, video games proved to be a cost-effective entertainment option compared to other forms of spending. However, today's landscape presents new challenges as consoles and games have become more expensive, and alternatives like subscription services and free-to-play games offer competition in terms of cost-effectiveness. The recent impact of COVID-19 lockdowns may also affect consumer priorities, given the prolonged period of home isolation.

Image credit: Rockstar Games, GTA 5

Zelnick's argument aligns with the mindset of cost-conscious consumers, suggesting that video games offer better value on a "per-hour" basis. However, the accuracy of his perspective will only become clear as the market continues to evolve. The debate surrounding game length and value reflects the complexities of determining worth in the gaming industry. While examples of games with substantial gameplay hours support the value argument, the shifting economic landscape and availability of alternative entertainment options pose challenges for developers and consumers alike.

Read the original source here and join our 80 Level Talent platform and our Telegram channel, follow us on InstagramTwitter, and LinkedIn, where we share breakdowns, the latest news, awesome artworks, and more.

Join discussion

Comments 0

    You might also like

    We need your consent

    We use cookies on this website to make your browsing experience better. By using the site you agree to our use of cookies.Learn more